The method
How we compare
The same criteria for all. Every comparison uses the same grid — founding, ownership, manufacturing, palette, flagship matt and sheen, washability, coverage, drying, other finishes, tin sizes, price, samples, VOCs, where to buy — so a line reads across from one page to the next. The manufacturers' figures. Sheen levels, coverage, drying times and resistance classes come from each brand's data sheets and official pages, never from a review or a memory; where a brand publishes no figure, we say so.
Prices checked and dated. Other houses' prices are those displayed by the brand or seen at a French retailer, with the month of the check; the Mylands price is read from our catalogue as you view the page, so it cannot be out of date. Sources at the foot of every page. And an annual review: third-party figures move, we verify them and update the date.
In all honesty
What these pages are not
These pages are written by Mylands, the brand's official site in France. We sell one of the paints compared, and we say so. That is precisely why every comparison carries a section "where the other house keeps the edge", written with the same care as the rest: Farrow & Ball's and Ressource's shops, Little Greene's and Argile's deeper matt, the wallpapers, the bio-based ranges, the Architectural Colours — we do not hide them.
These pages publish no tables of colour "equivalents" between brands: colour names belong to their owners, and two formulas never give the same result under the same light. Nor do they replace the sample pot — the one method every house compared recommends. If you find an inaccurate figure, write to us: we correct it and cite the source.